Comments on: What’s The Alpha Carbon In Carbonyl Compounds? https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2012/03/26/weird-nomenclature-in-carbonyl-chemistry/ Mon, 10 Jun 2024 18:57:48 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.2 By: James Ashenhurst https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2012/03/26/weird-nomenclature-in-carbonyl-chemistry/#comment-696359 Mon, 10 Jun 2024 18:57:48 +0000 https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/?p=4904#comment-696359 In reply to Madhav Mittal.

That’s a valid question. Since one of the ketones is in the enol form, the OH has many properties of a carboxylic acid.

For this reason these compounds are sometimes called ‘vinylogous acids” since they undergo many reactions of carboxylic acids.

For example it’s possible to replace the OH group with Cl and perform addition-elimination reactions, much like one can perform nucleophilic acyl substitution reactions. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vinylogy

]]>
By: Madhav Mittal https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2012/03/26/weird-nomenclature-in-carbonyl-chemistry/#comment-695923 Thu, 06 Jun 2024 05:32:46 +0000 https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/?p=4904#comment-695923 MOC QUIZ ID-0407
In the diketo compound, as the most stable tautomer will be 1-keto-2-enol form, so shouldn’t it be consider as alpha-beta unsaturated carbonyl compound?

]]>
By: Find out the chemistry behind AHAs and BHAs in skin care - Emotion Master https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2012/03/26/weird-nomenclature-in-carbonyl-chemistry/#comment-693890 Thu, 16 May 2024 15:14:57 +0000 https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/?p=4904#comment-693890 […] AHA and BHA, “Alpha” and “Beta” designate the positions of the Hydroxy group concerning the Carboxylic Acid group in their chemical […]

]]>
By: James Ashenhurst https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2012/03/26/weird-nomenclature-in-carbonyl-chemistry/#comment-642511 Thu, 17 Nov 2022 18:29:41 +0000 https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/?p=4904#comment-642511 In reply to Todd.

Of course, alpha beta, and gamma are all relative terms. I thought about changing the diagram to put a blue “alpha” on the position where gamma is written to accomodate this point, but felt it would add some unnecessary clutter.

Furthermore, from a practical perspective with the beta keto ester, it is impossible to get deprotonation at the gamma carbon without deprotonating the alpha carbon first, and even then only after resorting to an extremely strong base to form the di-anion. So in this particular case I’m going to leave it as gamma.

]]>
By: James Ashenhurst https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2012/03/26/weird-nomenclature-in-carbonyl-chemistry/#comment-642509 Thu, 17 Nov 2022 17:28:15 +0000 https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/?p=4904#comment-642509 In reply to Todd.

Good point Todd. Thank you.

]]>
By: Todd https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2012/03/26/weird-nomenclature-in-carbonyl-chemistry/#comment-642504 Thu, 17 Nov 2022 15:59:42 +0000 https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/?p=4904#comment-642504 With regard to multiple functional groups, in the beta-keto acid example at the top of the page, I see the carbon labeled gamma as being alpha. It is both (gamma to the ester carboxyl carbon but alpha to to the ketone carbon). However for me, alpha is more relevant as in my biochemistry class, I often point out that our reactions involve the special nature of the alpha carbon (aldol and Claisen condensations, Citrate Synthase, etc…). Being gamma is not as relevant.

]]>
By: James Ashenhurst https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2012/03/26/weird-nomenclature-in-carbonyl-chemistry/#comment-638095 Thu, 15 Sep 2022 17:03:49 +0000 https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/?p=4904#comment-638095 In reply to Dion.

yes – technically it would be 1,8-addition. The term, “1,8-addition” has even been used: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jo00038a053

]]>
By: James Ashenhurst https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2012/03/26/weird-nomenclature-in-carbonyl-chemistry/#comment-638094 Thu, 15 Sep 2022 17:01:48 +0000 https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/?p=4904#comment-638094 In reply to Swagnik.

It wouldn’t apply to the first molecule because there’s no carbonyl.
For the second, it’s a relationship issue.
So in CH3C=OCH2CH2CHO, the CH3 is alpha to the C=O; the first CH2 is alpha to the C=O but beta to the CHO; the next CH2 is beta to the C=O but alpha to the CHO.

]]>
By: James Ashenhurst https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2012/03/26/weird-nomenclature-in-carbonyl-chemistry/#comment-623718 Thu, 31 Mar 2022 18:49:43 +0000 https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/?p=4904#comment-623718 In reply to shailya.

Thank you, glad you found it helpful shailya. James

]]>
By: shailya https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2012/03/26/weird-nomenclature-in-carbonyl-chemistry/#comment-623715 Thu, 31 Mar 2022 18:21:23 +0000 https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/?p=4904#comment-623715 Marvellous explanation, quite helpful. Especially the problems at the end are quite worthful.

]]>