Comments on: In Summary: Evaluating Resonance Structures https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2011/12/22/in-summary-resonance/ Mon, 23 Sep 2024 17:54:38 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.2 By: James Ashenhurst https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2011/12/22/in-summary-resonance/#comment-691744 Tue, 23 Apr 2024 16:25:43 +0000 https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/?p=3664#comment-691744 In reply to Shubhankar.

We make resonance structures because it is otherwise very difficult to simply show the electron density in structures with partial bonds.

]]>
By: Shubhankar https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2011/12/22/in-summary-resonance/#comment-691703 Tue, 23 Apr 2024 09:24:25 +0000 https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/?p=3664#comment-691703 I have understand this but I have a very small doubt that
What is Resonance why do we make resonating structures ?

]]>
By: James Ashenhurst https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2011/12/22/in-summary-resonance/#comment-554271 Sat, 27 Apr 2019 03:45:54 +0000 https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/?p=3664#comment-554271 In reply to Rajeev kumar.

NO is a sigma acceptor but a pi donor. It is an ortho-para director, similar to halogens. https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2018/03/05/why-are-halogens-ortho-para-directors/

]]>
By: James https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2011/12/22/in-summary-resonance/#comment-520025 Tue, 12 Sep 2017 21:12:40 +0000 https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/?p=3664#comment-520025 In reply to Paul.

Thanks for weighing in Paul!

]]>
By: Paul https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2011/12/22/in-summary-resonance/#comment-519970 Mon, 11 Sep 2017 15:04:09 +0000 https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/?p=3664#comment-519970 In reply to James.

General chemistry teaches the evils of charge separation, but far, far overstates it. Charge separation is awful in the gas-phase, but in polar/complexing solvent, it is not nearly as bad as is suggested. The bigger, overriding issue is not the charge separation but the lack of the octet that normally accompanies it. I’d take charge separation with octets over no-charge separation without octets (take that “expanded octet” nonsense!).

But even with lack of octets, we know that charge separation is not bad when you have polar bonds. The carbonyl is a very polar bond. Hence, we can say that the polarized resonance structure is important.

]]>
By: James https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2011/12/22/in-summary-resonance/#comment-511475 Wed, 19 Apr 2017 21:12:53 +0000 https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/?p=3664#comment-511475 In reply to pH.

I see absolutely no case for charge separation being a factor. Opposite charges attract anyway.

]]>
By: pH https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2011/12/22/in-summary-resonance/#comment-510952 Tue, 11 Apr 2017 08:29:12 +0000 https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/?p=3664#comment-510952 What about charge separation how does that factor stack up against other factors you have mentioned???

]]>
By: Rajeev kumar https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2011/12/22/in-summary-resonance/#comment-371011 Sun, 01 Mar 2015 06:21:54 +0000 https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/?p=3664#comment-371011 Please tell me about the resonance effect of NO group on benzene ring.

]]>
By: manishamanu https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2011/12/22/in-summary-resonance/#comment-40650 Thu, 31 Oct 2013 05:49:11 +0000 https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/?p=3664#comment-40650 does low stable molecule contribute to resonance

]]>
By: ap_13 https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2011/12/22/in-summary-resonance/#comment-2503 Mon, 05 Mar 2012 10:16:08 +0000 https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/?p=3664#comment-2503 In reply to james.

uhhhhh……
I actually mentioned your site as great!!!

]]>