Comments on: Substituted Cyclohexanes – Axial vs Equatorial https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2014/06/27/substituted-cyclohexanes-equatorial-vs-axial/ Thu, 07 Dec 2023 22:10:43 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.2 By: Ranking The Bulkiness Of Substituents On Cyclohexanes: “A-Values” | Straight A Mindset https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2014/06/27/substituted-cyclohexanes-equatorial-vs-axial/#comment-679048 Thu, 07 Dec 2023 22:10:43 +0000 https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/?p=8367#comment-679048 […] the last post we saw that adding a methyl group to cyclohexane results in two chair conformers that are […]

]]>
By: Substituted Cyclohexanes – Axial vs Equatorial | Straight A Mindset https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2014/06/27/substituted-cyclohexanes-equatorial-vs-axial/#comment-679044 Thu, 07 Dec 2023 22:09:16 +0000 https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/?p=8367#comment-679044 […] Summary: Axial Vs Equatorial Groups […]

]]>
By: BJ https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2014/06/27/substituted-cyclohexanes-equatorial-vs-axial/#comment-582231 Mon, 13 Jul 2020 00:01:01 +0000 https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/?p=8367#comment-582231 When I look down the 1 to 2 carbon and 5 to 4 carbon for the axial position I am getting exactly the Newman projection you have, however, for the equatorial position Newman when I look down the 1 to 2 carbon and 4 to 5 carbon I am not getting the same Newman projection.I am getting two regular looking Y’s instead(with the methyl group in the northwest of the left Y) while you have upside down Y’s with the methyl group in the southwest of the leftmost Y.

]]>
By: Ijaz khan https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2014/06/27/substituted-cyclohexanes-equatorial-vs-axial/#comment-580587 Wed, 27 May 2020 16:56:23 +0000 https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/?p=8367#comment-580587 Thank you It was really amazing to study organic chemistry from your site

]]>
By: James Ashenhurst https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2014/06/27/substituted-cyclohexanes-equatorial-vs-axial/#comment-572838 Tue, 10 Dec 2019 16:41:51 +0000 https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/?p=8367#comment-572838 In reply to Yahi.

No, the lone pairs of oxygen do not exert any steric influence. Thank you for the kind words.

]]>
By: Yahi https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2014/06/27/substituted-cyclohexanes-equatorial-vs-axial/#comment-572820 Tue, 10 Dec 2019 08:43:36 +0000 https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/?p=8367#comment-572820 In the note shouldn’t we consider the lone pairs of oxygen sir

Thank you sir for such a beautiful website I lost fear of organic just because of you

]]>
By: Md Atiur Rahman https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2014/06/27/substituted-cyclohexanes-equatorial-vs-axial/#comment-525178 Sun, 17 Dec 2017 21:41:15 +0000 https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/?p=8367#comment-525178 Dear sir,
I willbe very thankful if you kindly explain me the most stable conformation of the given molecule.

1-hydroxy 4 methyl 3,4 dioxane, Assuming both the methyl and Hydroxy group is faced towards the viewer.

]]>
By: Bredt’s Rule (And Summary of Cycloalkanes) — Master Organic Chemistry https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2014/06/27/substituted-cyclohexanes-equatorial-vs-axial/#comment-280905 Tue, 02 Sep 2014 20:07:19 +0000 https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/?p=8367#comment-280905 […] Axial substituents lead to greater torsional strain than equatorial substituents, since they experience two additional “gauche” interactions with the hydrogens on the ring carbons located two bonds away. Another way to look at the same phenomenon is to think of the axial group interacting with each of the axial hydrogens (“diaxial” interactions). For methylcyclohexane, the conformation where methyl is axial is 1.70 kcal/mol more unstable than the conformation where the methyl is equatorial, a number referred to as the “A-value” for CH3.  A-values have been measured for a large number of mono substituted cyclohexanes.  In particular, the A-value for t-butyl is so high (>4.5 kcal/mol) that cyclohexane rings with a t-butyl substituent are essentially “locked” in the position where the t-butyl is equatorial. […]

]]>